Responsible Party and Year Completed: RAND, 2021
Link: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA725-1.html
Status: Completed
Contact: Daniel Egel – [email protected] or Charlie Ries – [email protected]
Executive Summary:
The RAND study critically examines the viability of the two-state solution and alternative approaches to resolving the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Through conducting 33 focus groups with more than 270 participants including West Bank Palestinians, Gazan Palestinians, Israeli Jews, and Israeli Arabs, the study collects diverse opinions on five potential solutions: the status quo, a two-state solution, a confederation, annexation, and a one-state solution. None of the alternatives was acceptable to a majority of both Israelis and Palestinians. The two-state solution was the most politically viable option despite recent loss of popularity and scepticism expressed by all parties.
RESEARCH FINDINGS:
- None of the alternatives to a two-state solution explored are acceptable to a majority of Israelis and Palestinians.
- The two-state solution is the most politically viable alternative but all voiced scepticism toward this alternative.
- For Israelis the status quo was most preferred option and a one state solution the least favourite.
- Palestinians favoured the two-state solution but with major changes.
- Separation was the single most important factor determining acceptability.
POLICY INSIGHTS:
- No alternative to the status quo will be viable without a shift in domestic and international politics.
- International security guarantees for Palestinians will likely be necessary for any peaceful resolution of the conflict.
- Educating the Israelis and Palestinians on the alternatives could lead to more pragmatic decision making.